Redistricting CA

Our Once In A Decade Opportunity to Map California’s Future... 

Blog + Videos

ARP Interview Questions

Jul 22, 2010

From: Gustavo Cubias [mailto:gcubias11@students.claremontmckenna.edu] Subject: ARP Interview Questions

Today the ARP agreed upon ( through motions and votes) asking the
following questions at the Applicant Interviews next month. The
questions were taken from the ARP Counsel memorandum listed below.

Memorandum:
http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/downloads/arp_public_meeting_20100719_memo.
pdf

Applicant Review Panel Interview Questions for CRC Applicants

2. What specific skills do you believe a good commissioner should
possess? Of those skills, which do you possess? Which do you not
possess and how will you compensate for it? Is there anything in your
life that would prohibit or impair your ability to perform all of the
duties of a Commissioner?

4. Describe a circumstance from your personal experience where you had
to work with others to resolve a conflict or difference of opinion.
Please describe the issue, and explain your role in addressing and
resolving the conflict. If you are selected to serve on the Citizens
Redistricting Commission, tell us how you would resolve conflicts that
may arise among the commissioners.

5. How will the commission's work impact the state? Which of these
impacts will improve the state the most? Is there any potential for the
commission's work to harm the state and, if so, in what ways?

9. Describe a situation where you have had to work as part of a group to
achieve a common goal. Tell us about the goal, describe your role within
the group, and tell us how the group worked or did not work
collaboratively to achieve this goal. If you are selected to serve on
the Citizens Redistricting Commission, tell us what you would do to
foster collaboration among the commissioners and ensure the Commission
meets its legal deadlines. 10. A considerable amount of the commission's work will involve meeting
with people from all over California who come from very different
backgrounds and very different perspectives. If you are selected to
serve on the commission, tell us about the specific skills you possess
that will make you effective at interacting with the public.

Greenlining Institute releases Citizens Redistricting Commission Data

Jul 8, 2010

From: Jonathan Munoz [mailto:jonathanm@greenlining.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:16 AM
Cc: Tunua Thrash
Subject: Greenlining Institute Citizens Redistricting Commission Data

I just wanted to share with the both of you some data/fact sheets the Greenlining Institute developed regarding the 314 remaining Citizens Redistricting Commission applicants. I also wanted to inform you both of the Greenlining Institute’s California Community Redistricting Leaders initiative and the application we have in seeking candidates for this opportunity. Please feel free to share the data/fact sheets as well as the Greenlining Institute leaders application through your networks.

Respectfully,

Jonathan Muñoz 
Academy Associate 
The Greenlining Institute
1918 University Ave 
Berkeley, CA 94704
www.greenlining.org

jonathanm@greenlining.org
Phone (510) 926-4025

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


BE A GREENLINING INSTITUTE FAN ON:
Facebook
www.facebook.com/Greenlining
Twitter
www.twitter.com/Greenlining
YouTube
www.youtube.com/user/GreenliningInstitute

 

New Rose Institute post on redistricting commission applicants

Jun 30, 2010

Kathay Feng

Sent via Blackberry


From: "Douglas Johnson" <doug@talksoftly.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:02:09 -0700
To: <roseinstitute@cmc.edu>
Subject: New Rose Institute post on redistricting commission applicants

FYI: http://rosereport.org/20100629/diversity-and-the-ca-redistricting-commission/

This post breaks down the demographics within the Democratic, Republican, and Other pools of applicants for the CA Redistricting Commission, and it discusses the likelihood of applicants in each pool advancing.

For example, did you know that the only remaining Pacific Islander in the applicant pool is a Republican, and that he's in the group of 31 applicants that received favorable evaluations from all three panel members at their last meeting? That, and other useful nuggets, plus the identity of the "623rd remaining applicant," are available in that post.

Please forward to anyone you think might be interested. And follow us on our blog (http://www.RoseReport.org) and twitter (@RoseInstitute) for future analysis and minute-by-minute twitter updates of the ARP meeting.

- Doug

Douglas Johnson

Fellow

Rose Institute of State and Local Government

Claremont McKenna College

o 909-621-8159

m 310-200-2058

douglas_johnson@alumni.cmc.edu or

doug@talksoftly.com

www.RoseReport.org

Next ARP Open Meeting - June 30, 2010

Jun 26, 2010

Kathay Feng

Sent via Blackberry


From: "Diane Hamel" <ARPDianeH@bsa.ca.gov>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:25:38 -0700
Subject: Next ARP Open Meeting - June 30, 2010

Pursuant to your request for notification of upcoming meetings, please be advised that the next meeting of the Applicant Review Panel will be held on

Wednesday, June 30, 2010, commencing at 9:30 a.m.  Please see the attached agenda for additional details, or view the agenda on the Internet at

http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/selection.html.  You may obtain further information about the meeting by calling (866) 356-5217 or contacting

Diane Hamel, Executive Secretary for the Applicant Review Panel, at 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814 or arpdianeh@bsa.ca.gov.

If you no longer wish to receive notification regarding upcoming Panel meetings, please let us know by responding to this message.

Diane Hamel

Executive Secretary II

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments thereto, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information and/or information relating to an ongoing audit by the Bureau of State Audits.  It is therefore required to be kept confidential by sections 8545 and 8545.1 of the Government Code.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution of this e-mail is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


***************************************************************** * Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any * * attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) * * and may contain confidential and privileged information, * * including information pertaining to an ongoing audit or * * investigation (see Cal. Gov. C. Secs. 8545, 8545.1 and * * 8547). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or * * distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended * * recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and * * destroy all copies of the original message. * *****************************************************************

Redistricting battle 2010

Jun 26, 2010

SacBee reports the lineup of initiatives on the November ballot sets the stage for a big fight over redistricting. Kathay Feng

Sent via Blackberry

2 Initiatives on redistricting in November 10

Jun 25, 2010

10 measures on the 2010 Nov Ballot – including one to expand redistricting commission’s scope to Congress and one to eliminate citizen’s commission. The full link is at the Secretary of State’s website: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures.htm. No proposition numbers yet.

It’s gonna be a long hot summer!

Initiative Constitutional Amendment
1380. (09-0027) - Final Random Sample Update - 05/05/10

Redistricting of Congressional Districts.

Summary Date: 10/23/09 | Qualified: 05/05/10 | Signatures Required: 694,354

Proponent: Charles T. Munger, Jr. votersfirstactforcongress@gmail.com

Removes elected representatives from the process of establishing congressional districts and transfers that authority to the recently-authorized 14-member redistricting commission. Redistricting commission is comprised of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four voters registered with neither party. Requires that any newly-proposed district lines be approved by nine commissioners including three Democrats, three Republicans, and three from neither party. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Probably no significant change in state redistricting costs. (09-0027.) (Full Text)

Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
1451. (09-0107) - Final Random Sample Update - 06/24/10

Eliminates State Commission on Redistricting. Consolidates Authority for Redistricting with Elected Representatives.

Summary Date: 02/05/10 | Qualified: 06/24/10 | Signatures Required: 694,354

Proponent: Daniel Lowenstein c/o Fredric D. Woocher (310) 576-1233

Eliminates 14-member redistricting commission selected from applicant pool picked by government auditors. Consolidates authority for establishing state Assembly, Senate, and Board of Equalization district boundaries with elected state representatives responsible for drawing congressional districts. Reduces budget, and imposes limit on amount Legislature may spend, for redistricting. Provides that voters will have the authority to reject district boundary maps approved by the Legislature. Requires populations of all districts for the same office to be exactly the same. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Likely decrease in state redistricting costs totaling several million dollars every ten years. (09-0107.) (Full Text)

Kathay Feng

Executive Director

California Common Cause

(213) 252-4552

Save the date! September 25, Palo Alto

Ready for Summer!

Fw: California Community Redistricting Leaders Fellowship Program

Jun 23, 2010

Kathay Feng

Sent via Blackberry


From: "Tunua Thrash" <tunuat@greenlining.org>
Sender: tunua thrash <tunuat.gli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:04:15 -0700
To: 'Kathay Feng'<kfeng@commoncause.org>; <johng@greenlining.org>; <turnerp@saveafricaschildren.org>
ReplyTo: <tunuat@greenlining.org>
Cc: 'Jonathan Munoz'<jonathanm@greenlining.org>; 'Patricia Guerra'<patriciag@greenlining.org>
Subject: California Community Redistricting Leaders Fellowship Program

Hello!

I hope this email finds you well!

Per my email earlier this summer, Greenlining is proud to announce the California Community Redistricting Leaders Fellowship Program!  I have attached the application for your reference, please feel free to forward to your networks.

As part of our statewide strategy to engage key communities and leaders in the redistricting process, Greenlining has developed a year-long fellowship for any one age 23 to 73+ interested in an extracurricular opportunity to learn about redistricting, obtain leadership training and implement a specific advocacy agenda (redistricting).

We had a soft launch this week but expect to distribute more widely next week! I wanted to make sure you were in the know ASAP!

Tunua

PS – Congratulations to John, who continues in the running to become… California’s first (Latino) Redistricting Commissioner!

Tunua Thrash

Director of Innovation

The Greenlining Institute

310-499-8470

Connect with us on the web: www.greenlining.org 

Become a fan on Facebook: www.facebook.com/Greenlining 

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Greenlining 

Watch us on YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/GreenliningInstitute

Important Commission Dates

Jun 21, 2010

Important Dates to Remember

  • Feb 17, 2010 - Supplemental Application is available
  • Apr 19, 2010 - Deadline for supplemental application and letters of recommendation
  • Late summer, 2010 - ARP interviews 120 of the most qualified applicants
  • Oct 1, 2010 - List of 60 of the most qualified applicants to Legislative leaders
  • Nov 15, 2010 - Legislative leaders return list
  • Nov 20, 2010 - Random selection of first eight commissioners
  • Dec 31, 2010 - Last day first eight commissioners have to select the remaining six
  • Jan 1, 2011 - First Citizens Redistricting Commission must start work!

Kathay Feng

Executive Director

California Common Cause

(213) 252-4552

Save the date! September 25, Palo Alto

Coalition Letter to BSA, 06-01-10

Jun 1, 2010

This is the letter that a coalition of organizations presented to the BSA on June 1, 2010 re: proposed regulations for the Commissioner selection process.

Kathay Feng

Executive Director, California Common Cause

Holding Power Accountable

www.commoncause.org/ca

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2910 - Release Date: 05/31/10 23:25:00

Info tidbit: things done right in Prop 11 re budget

May 18, 2010

From: Douglas Johnson [mailto:djohnson@ndcresearch.com]

An interesting note for anyone interested, and a thanks to those who ensured Prop 11 got this point right:

Arizona's Prop 106 created Arizona's Independent Redistricting Commission. For the Commission's budget, it stated  the following:

(18) . . . THE TREASURER OF THE STATE SHALL MAKE $6,000,000 AVAILABLE FOR THE WORK OF THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PURSUANT TO THE YEAR 2000 CENSUS. UNUSED MONIES SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE STATE'S GENERAL FUND. IN YEARS ENDING IN EIGHT OR NINE AFTER THE YEAR 2001, THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION OR ITS SUCCESSOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE LEGISLATURE A RECOMMENDATION FOR AN APPROPRIATION FOR ADEQUATE REDISTRICTING EXPENSES AND SHALL MAKE AVAILABLE ADEQUATE OFFICE SPACE FOR THE OPERATION OF THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY APPROPRIATIONS BY A MAJORITY VOTE. 

In 2001, the Arizona Commission spent about $2.4 million on redistricting, then spent the rest of the $6 million plus an additional appropriation on legal battles (which the Commission ultimately won).

Here's the catch: there was no specific language about how much should be appropriated for the 2011 redistricting commission. Alarmingly, I am told that the AZ Governor's current budget proposal proposed $300,000 and the Legislative Leadership is proposing $500,000.

Thankfully, Proposition 11 takes care of the 2021 and future commissions, requiring appropriation of "the greater of three million dollars ($3,000,000), or the amount expended pursuant to this subdivision in the immediately proceeding redistricting process, as each amount is adjusted by the cumulative change in the California Consumer Price Index," (section 8253.6).

Douglas Johnson

Fellow

Rose Institute of State and Local Government

Claremont McKenna College

o 909-621-8159

m 310-200-2058

douglas_johnson@alumni.cmc.edu or

doug@talksoftly.com

www.RoseReport.org

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2653 - Release Date: 01/28/10 14:55:00